Gurgaon, as everyone knows, is a very different entity from Delhi;
to be truthful it is quite different from most places. It is close
in topography to my childhood fantasies of a Martian landscape (big
hulking buildings set within an undifferentiated, flattened,
unpopulated and dusty landscape). The irony of the new Devi Art
Foundation building is that in a landscape where every building is
so outlandishly modern and uber-shiny, it looks out of place by its
austerity. Aniket Bhagwat, the architect of the building, has
brought curving brick, rusted metal and the open air into a design
program that, whilst casting a nod at iconic Indian modernist brick
buildings such as Kahn’s IIM in Ahmedabad and Gujral’s Belgian
embassy, is at once in conversation with such recent international
projects as Libeskind’s Jewish Museum in Berlin. It is broken into
two wings and spread over multiple floors with an open court in the
middle of the complex, the front entrance connecting the wings by
way of walkways that are semi open. Oh yes, and it is a
masterpiece; without doubt the finest building to house art in
India since independence.
Driving up to the Devi Art Foundation opening on Saturday we
encountered such a jam of cars on the dusty approach road that all
one could see was a dark orange fog illuminated by the lights from
the building. The flotsam and jetsam of the international art scene
congregated on the road air kissing in the haze whilst nearby
service staff looked on bemused. Up the sprawling steps, at the
threshold of the building, an enormous crush of humanity gawped at
the new edifice, delaying the pleasure of entering for as long as
possible: having waited for this moment for so long no one was
quite sure whether expectations could be matched with reality.
As if there were any doubt the party rocked: it rocked very hard.
Anupam Poddar, master of ceremonies, had erected an enormous bar in
the centre of the open court that kept the hundreds (perhaps more
than a thousand) well watered throughout the night. The whole of
the Indian art world was in attendance – nearly every major
gallery, curator, writer and artist turned up. Every auction house
of significance sent delegations; international consultants and
advisors prowled the galleries and walkways. This was an art event
at its sexiest, most effervescent best. By one in the morning the
music had got the best of even the most sedate among the visitors
and an impromptu dance-floor was made of the courtyard. Past gripes
and grievances were put aside as we all sweated and panted into the
wee hours. It was not until four in the morning that someone came
to their senses and switched off the music by which time those who
remained realized that even the host had left some time before. As
we all stumbled home we knew that something very impressive had
just occurred and that we had all participated in a landmark
event.
The next morning as I nursed a hangover over a cup of ludicrously
strong coffee I realized that in all the fun of the night before I
had spent very little time with the art that was installed. I
remembered the urinals with the rose petals in the bowl, I
remembered the underground parking with the tilting columns, I
remembered the sloping brickwork that gave the walls the impression
of lapping waves, but I could not remember much of the art I had
seen. Indeed during the night very few people had engaged me in
conversation about the work that was on display. As a show premised
on the moving image, it had all the names –Sonia Khurana, Shilpa
Gupta, Ranbir Kaleka as well as the up and coming stars of new
media like Baptist Coelho and Susanta Mandal. Yet the work somehow
was not able to speak over the din created both by the magnificence
of the building and the drone of the crowd assembled.
Was this a natural corollary of an opening night and the vast
amount of alcohol imbibed or, more ominously, was this indicative
of the fact that the work of the most celebrated media artists in
India is often mediocre? For sure much of the work on view was
fairly recent and perhaps the curator did not have access to older,
more seminal work. Nonetheless many of the artists are considered
at the peak of their careers presently and so, one would hope,
their work produced over the last few years would be compelling at
the very least. Ultimately the Devi Art Foundation is not
responsible for making the art that it displays. It can only choose
the best, hang it in the most optimal manner possible and get the
crowds in, all of which it has proved it can do in spades. Beyond
that we have to wait for the art that is worthy of the building
that has been created for it.
Mortimer Chatterjee is a
Mumbai based gallerist specializing in contemporary art. For more
information visit
Chatterjee&Lal.